David Kaib: Independence Day

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sat Jul 04, 2009 at 20:20


David Kaib said something that might seem very small at first.  But it's about language, and language is about defining reality, and (a) that's the first step to changing reality and (b) that's very much what today's little exercise here on Open Left is all about:

Here's my hope

That we can start with the small step of calling this day Independence Day, not Fourth of July. It recently struck me how odd it is to refer to the day by its date - the only holiday I can think of we do that for. Is there any doubt that his is because of its political content - like so much political language, this seems to be an example of "blunt[ing] the too sharply pointed."

From there, I hope that we can reconnect with the meaning of today (this post by Paul, and Mike's above, are great starts) and other holidays - like MLK and Labor Day. Perhaps we might also use this day as a chance to think about the ways we have yet to root out royalism / aristocracy in our culture - whether that be the way we treat presidents, senators, celebrities, or the rich.  Or perhaps maybe (it's a small thing, I know), I could go to the grocery store and not have to see magazines detailing the lives of British princes

I couldn't think about any of the above-Independence Day, reclaiming meaning, calling things by their true names--without immediately thinking about another, closely-related meaning of "Independence Day," the Gretchen Peters song made famous by Martina McBride, a song which embodies its own set of contested meanings that resonate powerfully with what we've been talking about here today, and which became a part of campaign contest last fall.  Here's the Wikipedia entry on its background:

The lyrics tell a story of a woman's response to domestic abuse, seen from the point of view of her daughter. The song's music video was somewhat controversial at the time of its release, because of its graphic depiction of domestic violence. The ending of the video is particularly intense, as it shows the young girl's home burning to the ground, implying that the mother had been responsible for the fire, and that she and the abusive father both perished in the fire.

The lyrics have a double meaning in that the woman in the story is finally gaining her "freedom" from her abusive husband. Thus, it is her "independence day." The title also refers to the fact that the events noted in the song happened on America's Independence Day, or July 4.

And its use in politics:

Writer Gretchen Peters has objected to Hannity's use of the song, and engaged in a "personal protest" by donating to organizations such as ACLU, PFLAG and MoveOn.org. When the song was used to introduce Republican Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin at a rally in October 2008, Peters publicly announced that she considered the use of the theme, in view of Palin's opposition to abortion even in cases of rape and incest to be "beyond irony" and that "[Palin] represented the opposite of what this song really is all about". She said that she intended to donate all royalties from the song during the election cycle to Planned Parenthood, in Gov. Palin's name.

I would have embeded the video as part of this diary, but embeding has been disabled.  It's quite powerful, and you can see it here.  Lyrics on the flip.

Paul Rosenberg :: David Kaib: Independence Day
Independence Day
By Gretchen Peters

Well she seemed all right by dawn's early light though she looked a little
Worried and weak
She tried to pretend he wasn't drinkin' aagain but daddy left
The proof on her cheek
And I was only eight years old that summer and I always seemed to be in the way
So I took myself down to the fair in town on
Independence day

Well word gets a round in a small, small town
They said he was a dangerous man
But mama was proud and she stood her ground
She knew she was on the losin' end
Some folks whispered some folks talked but everybody looked the other way
And when time ran out there was no one about on Indpendence day

Chours: Let freedom ring.
Let the white dove sing
Let the whole world know that today is a day of reckoning.
Let the weak be strong.
Let the right be wrong.
Roll the stone away. Let the guilty pay.
It's independence day

Well she lit up the sky that Fourth of July
by the time the firemen came they just put out the flames and took down some names
And send me to the county home
Now I ain't sayin' it's right or it's wrong,
but maybe it's the only way.
Talk about your revolution. It's Indepenednce Day


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
"... the ways we have yet to root out royalism / aristocracy in our culture..." (0.00 / 0)
And then, after we turn the Fourth of July into an anti-aristocratic hootenanny, we can invent a whole new pantheon of Revolutionary heroes to replace the aristocrats who made the American Revolution, like Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Sam Adams, John Hancock, and virtually every other signatory of the Declaration of Independence, signed on the Fourth of July, 1776.

Stop being such a buzz kill ... (4.00 / 2)
you can poo-poo the signers of the Declaration of Independence all you want .. but they took huge gambles that could have cost them their lives .. most of the Senators and Representatives today aren't fit to shine the Founding Father's shoes

[ Parent ]
Not to mention (4.00 / 2)
it would do this country and our future a world of good to actually learn about the Declaration of Independence and its history. That is, if we could keep from white washing it all as we've done to Martin Luther King and the holiday in his honor (as I've mentioned previously in one of Paul's great posts):

History (written by the victors) has neatly boxed MLK (and the holiday in his name) into a tidy, nonthreatening little box of nothing more and nothing less than "I Have A Dream". It can be no accident that his strong pro-labor and anti-war stances have been all but forgotten because they are never taught
.

[ Parent ]
Not To Mention (4.00 / 1)
The folks Freeze names were all from the bourgeoisie, not the aristocracy.  While the Southern planter class certainly had aristocratic pretensions, the rejection of aristocratic titles in the Constitution was almost as striking and novel a feature as the absence of any reference to God, and the rejection of any religious test.

The fact that Freeze in his typical righteous indignation would fail Class Analysis 101 gave me quite a chuckle last night.  But I wanted to wait and see how others would weigh in before adding my paltry two cents.

"Senate passes expanded GI bill despite Bush, McCain opposition"


[ Parent ]
"Aristocracy" (0.00 / 0)
If there's no aristocracy in the United States, because there are no "aristocratic titles," as Paul Rosenberg now claims, it doesn't make sense to talk about rooting out "royalism/aristocracy," which was the premise of his silly diary..

The usual definitions of "aristocracy" cover anything at the top of a social pyramid (and it's more or less superfluous to include a hereditary component in the definition, because every ruling class is adept at perpetuating itself)...

The aristocracy are people considered to be in the highest social class in society, who traditionally have land, money, and power.

And apart from the internet currency of Wikipedia, there's also a long line of American historians like George Bancroft,  Frederick Jackson Turner, and especially Charles A. Beard, who analyzed the early history of the United States as an interplay of the "counter-revolutionary" aspirations of the old colonial aristocracy against populist resistance on the frontier.

Although Beard was much more hostile to the aristocracy than Turner and Bancroft (Beard actually called the Framers of the Constitution "anti-American"), Turner was also haunted by a vision of the old dichotomy between aristocrats and frontiersmen transformed into permanent classes of plutocrats and proletarians, and yet...

In spite of infinite differences in emphasis and approval, no reputable American historian ever denied that the Constitution and Declaration of Independence were designed and enforced by American aristocrats.


[ Parent ]
Washington signed the Declaration? Madison? News to me! (0.00 / 0)
And Hamilton, the bastard son of a disinherited Scot who abandoned him and his mother when he was a child, was never rich, and died in debt, was an aristocrat?

News to me!

The liberal soul shall be made fat. He who waters shall be watered also himself. (Proverbs 11:25)


[ Parent ]
Um, Cinco de Mayo, Juneteenth, May Day, 9/11 (0.00 / 0)
Lots of holidays or rememberance days named after the date.

And before long, so will Sarah Palin's Independance Day!

The liberal soul shall be made fat. He who waters shall be watered also himself. (Proverbs 11:25)


Fair enough (0.00 / 0)
My point was that we don't do much in the way of focusing on what the day is about (that is not unique to any particular holiday.)  If we get past the fireworks and barbecue, we often just lionize the people at the top (who did not make the Revolution, they were only a part of it.)  

But there are larger lessons here, that are obscured when we fail to focus on what independence was about.  It's not just about our country, it's about each one of us (which is Paul's excellent point), and about people around the globe - who have every right to self-determination that our political ancestors had (which was the point of my quick hit from yesterday). Merely using the name Independence Day rather than 4th of July is a small step - thinking and talking about what independence is about today, for all of us, is the key.  This series is helping making that happen. There seems to be a lot of this going on in the blogosphere.  

Who are the best keepers of the people's liberties? The people themselves. The sacred trust can be no where so safe as in the hands most interested in preserving it.
James Madison


[ Parent ]
No problem, I was just snarking (4.00 / 1)
Although, the irony is that July 2nd was the real independance day, because that's when the decision to declare independance was voted on. The 4th was when the DoI was signed, which at that point was more ceremonial than substantive. So the name of this holiday is wrong in at least 2 ways! Hell, so is Presidents' Day, which isn't the birthday of either of the 2 presidents' birthdays celebrated. And why is Veterans' Day, which was originally Armistice Day, commemorating the end of WWI, still known as such, since all WWI veterans are probably long since gone? Shouldn't it be combined with Memorial Day?

Also, shouldn't we be celebrating the end of both the Revolutionary and Civil wars, certainly both happy days? WWII is more complicated, since it had 2 end dates.

Anyway.

The liberal soul shall be made fat. He who waters shall be watered also himself. (Proverbs 11:25)


[ Parent ]
I'll be surprised if "Labor Day" survives 9/11/11 (0.00 / 0)
there can only be one end-of-summer holiday obviously.

I suspect/predict that, as the 10th Anniversary of "the day that changed the world" approaches, there will be incredible pressure to demote "labor" and to promote "Patriots' Day" or some other reeking rhetorical pile of patriotic shit in its place.

I mean, nobody in the USof A actually admires "labor," anymore, do they? The unions are dead. Workers are replaceable as widgets.

But We Must Never Forget The Sacrifice Of Those Brave People On That Terrible DAY!@!!


"the day that changed the world" (0.00 / 0)
Gah. That makes me want to throw up every time I hear it. Americans are so isolated and ignorant of almost everything outside of the U.S., nothing really matters unless/until it happens to us.

demote "labor" and to promote "Patriots' Day" or some other reeking rhetorical pile of patriotic shit in its place.

Nicely stated, even if tragically sad in its truthfulness. And as you said, it would easy enough to expand Patriots' Day into a national holiday.  


[ Parent ]
RE: another, closely-related meaning of "Independence Day" (4.00 / 1)
A RELATED MOVIE: "Independence Day" (1983)

FROM IMDB:

(EXCERPT) As Keith's suicidal and physically-abused sister, Dianne Wiest gave a heartbreaking performance. The dramatic decision she makes that directly affects her abusive husband (Cliff DeYoung, who also does a great job with his despicable character) and indirectly affects the lead characters, definitely chilled my bones.
Weist's performance here was three years before her first of three supporting Oscar nominations, with 2 wins for Hannah and Her Sisters and Bullets Over Broadway...

(EXCERPT) I saw this movie probably 20 years ago and believe you me, I have never forgotten it. This is a very intense and compelling drama that contains some very serious subject matter, that being spousal abuse of the worst kind. The abused character,(Diane Weist)depicts the sorrowful circumstances of a woman caught-up in a really bad marriage and the way she exacts her revenge is the spellbinding climax of the movie. Having firsthand knowledge of this subject matter I found the movie to be one of the first to depict one of the many ways an abused woman does in the end truly claim independence...

IMDB LINK - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...



Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search