My Own Review of Michael Moore's "Capitalism: A Love Story"

by: Michael Kwiatkowski

Fri Oct 09, 2009 at 19:46


After seeing Capitalism: A Love Story today, I thought I'd give my own review in response to the one by metamars.

Two big criticisms are made against the otherwise excellent film, only one of which stands up under scrutiny.  Yes, Obama is left virtually unscathed by Moore's damning critique of Congressional acquiescence to Wall Street's fear-mongering.  As we all witnessed during last year's debacle, Obama was one of the chief proponents of the Wall Street bailout in the U.S. Senate, pushing for the no-strings-attached version that ultimately passed.  That Obama is as responsible as any other player in the nation's economic meltdown and the massive swindle that accompanied it cannot be ignored or denied, and Moore's acknowledgment that Wall Street contributed heavily to Obama seems like a punch undeservedly pulled.

The second big critique is that while the film's message rouses outrage, little or nothing is given in the way of what can actually be done about all of it.  Having now seen the film myself, I can see all kinds of ways in which We the People can fight back - not the least of which is using the power of the vote.  But there's more, much more, that can be done, and Moore illustrates them with great relish.

Factory workers denied their final paychecks when the company shut down its site took barricaded themselves inside and refused to leave until they got the money owed to them.

People whose home was foreclosed upon found aid in the form of an organization formed to keep families in their houses by way of squatting.  Police were called out, only to leave without enforcing the order to vacate after it became clear that no one was leaving.

I saw a bread-making factory, a co-op, meaning that each employee owns a piece of that factory and helps run it through a democratic process.  The CEO has no more or less say in how the company is run than anyone else, and surprisingly (or so Moore depicts) everyone makes at least a somewhat decent wage.

Last, and by no means least, is the power of the ballot.  Moore calls for a democratic revolution in Capitalism: A Love Story, the kind expressed at the ballot box.  Yes, We the people do have the power of the vote, and therefore wield far more power collectively than the top one percent of Americans.  Why else do you think there is such massive effort expended to disenfranchise us at the polling station?  Why else do you think we are encouraged to self-segregate ourselves along racial, religious, and class lines?  Why else do you think we are discouraged from even mentioning forming and using third political parties as a means of reshaping the two major ones?  It's because the powerful know that if We the People were to truly rise up at election time and vote in genuine representatives to replace the corporate whores, their days of power would be over.  Sure, they have the military and gobs of money, but if they were to drop the pretense of democracy by going all-out in their war against us, the rich would lose their only real weapon: our compliance.

Resistance through noncompliance worked for India.  It can work for us - if we have the will to use it.

More later.

Michael Kwiatkowski :: My Own Review of Michael Moore's "Capitalism: A Love Story"

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Been thinking about the "Moore doesn't tell us what to do" theme (4.00 / 2)
lately. That's how I felt when I left the theater. Called to arms, then given no direction. But somewhere during the last week, it hit me. Why wait for Michael Moore to tell me what to do? Besides, he gave me (us?) and entire feature film full of examples. Examples to emulate, to support. Why should I look to celebrities for direction?

Kind of like the Nobel for Obama, it gives me license to do what I might have been hesitating to do.  

"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


Oh yeah (4.00 / 1)
The idea about distributing organizing material at the theaters showing the film is an excellent idea, none the less.

I kind of wish Moore had taken a less capitalistic approach to marketing the film, but i hesitate to piss on his parade.

Could have used screenings as the organizing vehicle. Free public showings projected on warehouses, or foreclosed homes. Bring the crowds to the stars of his film. The media would follow. Its not like he needs more money, right?  

"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
When "SiCKO" found its way to the 'net... (0.00 / 0)
I remember a couple of years ago when SiCKO came out, someone got hold of a copy of the master DVD and put it out on the 'net early.  I managed to download the entire film, which I kept on my hard drive until I was able to purchase the DVD.  Moore had no problem with it making the rounds for free, because he wanted the movie seen and spread more than he wanted to make money from it.  This time, Moore's trying too hard to avoid pissing off Obama.  He really cannot accept that the dictator is part of the problem, and has no intention of changing anything for the better.  He's clinging to hope, that most terrible of illusions.



[ Parent ]





Donate to Open Left




blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
USER MENU

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search