Who Will Face Minority Leader McConnell in Kentucky?

by: Matt Stoller

Mon Jul 30, 2007 at 14:29


There are a few races this cycle that are critical for progressives, and none of them are more important than the one against Mitch McConnell.  McConnell is a very powerful member of the Senate, and has effectively outmaneuvered Harry Reid on the floor.  He is leading a filibuster of every piece of legislation important to progressives, often substituting in weak amendments that sound progressive or right-wing amendments that force Democrats on the defensive.  Fortunately, he's eminently beatable.  Here are his latest SUSA numbers, courtesy of the excellent Ditch Mitch blog.

Approval/Disapproval: 48/44%

Let's briefly take a look at the dynamics of the data:

Among Republicans (34% of July survey): In June, McConnell was 73/22%; now he's 67/25%.

Among Democrats (43% of July survey): In June, McConnell was 38/56%; now he's 38/57%.

Among independents (11% of July survey): In June, McConnell was 67%/30%; now he's 39/53%.

McConnell's been severely damaged by the war, by immigration, and by his association with Bush.  the war has turned the base of the Democrats viciously against him, his big business immigration stance and his meddling in a messy Republican gubernatorial primary has hurt him in conservative Boone County, and Bush is generally just dragging him down.  More significantly, there are a host of economically populist issues that could be used to tremendous effect in Kentucky, including community college funding, education, and health care.  The path is open for a progressive challenger similar to Jim Webb, though McConnell will be tough to beat and already has $5.7 million on hand.  So who could that be?

Matt Stoller :: Who Will Face Minority Leader McConnell in Kentucky?
Attorney General Greg Stumbo has an explatory committee, and though he a good track record going after corruption in the Governor's office he has his own track record of shadiness.  Businessman Charlie Owen is considering a run.  I've met Owen and I liked him, but he's taking a long time before deciding whether to jump into the race and has lost three races in his political career.  One significant problem for Owen is that he can self-finance, and so does not have to subject himself to the discipline that most candidates have to go through in terms of building a grassroots constituency.  Another possible candidate is Andrew Horne, an Iraq vet who lost to John Yarmuth in the primary last cycle.  I've also met and liked Horne, and he's been very involved in VoteVets. 

There are other possibilities in the race, and we could see late entrants as Kentucky has off-cycle state-wide elections in 2007.  I'd actually like to see a female progressive, since that'll make it harder for McConnell to go as negative as he tends to, though I don't know of anyone who fits the bill.  Right now, this race feels a bit like Connecticut's primary in 2006 in the sense that a candidate is going to ride on the backs of a movement.  This will be an anti-McConnell election, a fight against an entrenched machine.  The candidate will basically need to be very progressive, perhaps a bit nativist on immigration, while keeping their head down and the focus on McConnell's behavior.  The blogs, campaign finance groups, antiwar groups, anti-immigration groups, and a generally sour anti-Bush mood are hitting McConnell and taking down his approval ratings.  He's getting smacked around by the overall environment, and that's not going to stop. 

The difference this time is that the DSCC and the Democratic establishment wants him gone as well.  The DSCC has already run ads against him, there's a great deal of movement organizing, and this is already a place where there is substantial establishment-activist cooperation. 

Race tracker KY-Senate.


Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Independents (0.00 / 0)
Is that switch among independents correct? +37 percent to -14 percent in one month? That would really be something.

He Hasn't Lost Anything Among Dems (0.00 / 0)
While falling sharply among Reps and independents?  That's odd.  It's actually the Dems who seem to be keeping him afloat, in a sense.  If he'd dropped 7 points like he did among Reps, his overall approval would be below his disapproval, not just below 50 percent.

Then there's this:

Among men: In June, McConnell was 50/48; now heâ??s 53/42.

Among women: In June, McConnell was 55/37; now heâ??s 44/46.

[Percent signs removed because Soapblox can't handle them!  Hear that Soapy?  Grrr....]

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


i know about the Ajax problems (0.00 / 0)
the fix should be coming along soon! 

Don't start a blog, build a community with SoapBlox

[ Parent ]
Note The Smart Quote Problems, Too! (4.00 / 1)
In preview mode, they're fine--single or double quotes--then in display mode.... well, you can see it in the quoted block above.

And the ampersands.  Don't know what all else.  But that's your job, right?

Oh, yeah. Can't do things like < g > without the extra spaces.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
i find it ironic (0.00 / 0)
they named them "smart quotes"

That said, the percent signs, smart quotes and other things are fixed... I just have to verify them on other browsers.

Don't start a blog, build a community with SoapBlox


[ Parent ]
Smart Quotes, Stupid Software! (0.00 / 0)
Brackets are from Mars. Semicolons are from Venus.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
Stumbo (0.00 / 0)
Looks like he will be the one but I wish he wasn't. He doesn't seem very populist from what I hear. If Owen will spend 20 million, and that's what we'll need to win, and has a populist message I would support him. If Horne comes in with a pro-vet / populist message and can raise tons of money that would be great. We just need to find one of them as our canidate and get behind them strong.

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power

No Way (0.00 / 0)
I agree with most of your remark but it will not take $20 million to win a Senate seat in Kentucky.

Remember that challengers do not need as much money as incumbents.  If incumbents are vulnerable at all then challengers only need enough money to surpass the threshold of visibility.

The reason is that voters have made up their mind about incumbents.  Their negatives will not go away no matter how much money they raise.

Paul Herrnson writes about this in his book Congressional Election, CQ Press.


[ Parent ]
Yes.... (0.00 / 0)
More realistic is 10 million and the challenger doesn't need it all at once.  Jim Webb ran on brains and guts and the internet until finally the DSCC came in with some money. 

Owen has a good shot if he'll make up his mind.  Charlie's a good man and well-qualified.

  So is Horne. He's a terrific guy, tough-nosed Marine who could do very well. Horne is very well-liked and has raised his visibility.  He'll need some serious help money-wise.  If the national netroots takes this race seriously a miracle could happen for Horne.  The question is--how much do we want this seat.  I have no doubt that Owen or Horne could pull this off.

As for Stumbo, I'm uncertain about him.  I don't think he's as popular in the state and there have been questions about him.  I suspect we'll need the cleanest candidate we can find, either Owen or Horne.  Mitch can be brutal when he goes on the attack.  Mitch is as vulnerable as he's ever been, but this race is not gonna be a pushover.

The most important thing we can do is make this a race with national focus--especially the netroots.  We flexed our muscles in 06 and helped Webb win the Senate.  I'd really like to see the netroots show what we can really do and beating McConnell would be the real deal.

 


[ Parent ]
One More thing (0.00 / 0)
The Center for Rural Strategies has a new poll showing rural voters are trending back toward the Democratic Party.  I'm pretty sure the trend will hold true in Kentucky.  Many of these Kentucky Republicans live in rural areas and have been hit hard by outsourcing and the war in Iraq.  A lot of them are white rural veterans and we are very angry about how this war has been run, that our children have the choice between competing for a fast food job or joining the Army and the fact the rural infrastructure has fallen apart during the Bush years.  When you can't find potable drinking water, you're not doing better than you were 8 years ago. 

McConnell has held votes in rural Kentucky for a long time, but I think those votes are up for grabs in '08.







Donate to Open Left




blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
USER MENU

QUICK HITS
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search