Deal Breaker

by: ek hornbeck

Sat Nov 07, 2009 at 11:39


Jon Walker and David Dayen, both of Firedog Lake, are reporting that the Stupak Amendment which virtually bars BOTH Private Companies AND the Public Option from providing coverage for Reproductive Health Care for Women will receive a Floor Vote today in the House.

As Jon explains-

Stupak's amendment, by not allowing a private insurance company to sell a policy to anyone if they receive any amount of affordability tax credits, would make it impossible for a private insurance plan that covers abortion to survive on the individual and small group market. Stupak has threatened to bring down the entire bill if he does not get his amendment. Rep. Stupak called all previous "compromises" that had been offered "unacceptable."

As David reports-

The Democratic leadership is making a bet that, if it doesn't pass, Stupak and his cadres will sign on to the bill (I highly doubt it; most of them are no votes on health care entirely); and if it does pass, pro-choice Democrats won't sink the bill entirely (also, I highly doubt it). I'm a bit surprised that it's come to this. Also, Stupak appeared to have lied in the Rules Committee about how the deal "fell apart," since he got what he wanted.

This is an enormous bet, and not a well-designed one either, in my view. The Democratic Party will tomorrow give a minority of their caucus an opportunity to amend a large health care bill that would effectively ban abortion services coverage in the individual and small group insurance market, essentially telling private insurance companies what they cannot cover.

Quoting the Washington Post, David continues-

The amendment is expected to pass with the combined support of more than 40 anti-abortion Democrats and virtually every House Republican. That likelihood meant that leaders of the much larger group of Democrats who support abortion rights were not happy to learn of the deal.

"There will be no abortion, not just with public funds, but with private funds under the public option, and that's not acceptable," said Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.).

House leaders met with that bloc of Democrats late Friday to try to quell their frustration., but the agreement makes clear that they believe abortion-rights Democrats will find it difficult to vote against the health-care bill even with such a restriction attached to it.

As far as I'm concerned this is a flat out deal breaker.

Health Care Reform with the Stupak Amendment is not worth passing and I intend to call the House Leadership and my Congressperson today to express that opinion.

I urge you to do the same.

Cross posted from DocuDharma

ek hornbeck :: Deal Breaker

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Deal Breaker | 4 comments
Vent Hole (4.00 / 1)
Feel free to crosspost without attribution or link.

dkmich... (4.00 / 1)
another fellow OpenLeft member, also has an essay up titled- Stupak: Lip stick on a Democrat and Susie Madrak at Crooks and Liars covers this revolting development in Pelosi Will Allow Vote on Anti-Abortion Amendment This Morning. Call Your Critter Now!.

Only explaination (4.00 / 1)
The only explaination I can see for this is that Pelosi is a few votes short of passing a health bill and this is a desperate last roll of the dice to shake up a handful of votes.

What might pass without this monstrousity is universal health care outside the abortion age range say 0 to 12 and 50 plus.  What a joke.  Stupak's governor ambitions are now DOA.


HRC is worthless with the Stupak Amendment and must be defeated. (0.00 / 0)
It's UnConstitutional.

A Poll Tax.


[ Parent ]
Deal Breaker | 4 comments
Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search