Clinton's Superdelegates Lead Nearly Erased

by: Chris Bowers

Thu Apr 03, 2008 at 14:35


Right now, Democratic Convention Watch prominently displays the superdelegate endorsement totals compiled by four major sources. The AP shows Clinton ahead 250-220, CBS shows Clinton ahead 249-217, CNN gives Clinton an advantage of 243-212, and DCW itself shows Clinton ahead 246-216. These margins are virtually identical, and all show Clinton ahead by between 30 and 32 superdelegate endorsements. However, a closer look at the numbers strongly suggests that Clinton's superdelegate advantage is actually much smaller, and will probably be erased entirely before Pennsylvania.

Consider the following:

  • Add-on superdelegates: Democratic Convention Watch currently shows Obama ahead 2-0 among add-on superdelegates. At this point, very few add-on superdelegates have been chosen, and the complete schedule for when the rest of the 76 add-ons will be selected can be found here. Looking over the number of add-on superdelegates from states that have already held primaries or caucuses, and keeping in mind that add-on superdelegates are reviewed by each campaign before state party committees or state pledged delegate committees vote on these delegates, it seems that Obama will lead Clinton 40-24 among these delegates. (For this calculation, I am projecting a Clinton add-on victory in New Hampshire, a split in Missouri, and an Obama victory in Nevada and Texas). This means that Obama will actually close the superdelegate gap on Clinton by another 14 delegates once all of the add-ons are chosen, reducing Clinton's advantage from 30-32 down to 16-18 in favor of Clinton.

  • "Pelosi Club" superdelegates: Democratic Convention Watch also posts a list of seven superdelegates who have publicly stated they will endorse the candidate who wins the most pledged delegates. They call this group the "Pelosi Club," since Nancy Pelosi first made this pledge. At this point, since Obama only needs 37.4% of the remaining pledged delegates to win pledged delegates, he is a lock to be that candidate. As such, the four uncommitted superdelegates and one Clinton endorsing superdelegate in this "club" are all effectively Obama superdelegates. This adds five superdelegates to Obama's total, and removes one from Clinton, allowing Obama to close the 16-18 delegate gap down to 10-12.

  • Vacant superdelegate spots: There are currently at least six vacant superdelegate slots that will be filled before the convention. Four of those are vacant DNC spots, and two of them are in heavily Democratic congressional districts where special elections will be held between now and the convention. Of the DNC slots, one is from Illinois, and another is an at-large spot that I have learned is currently slated to go to an African-American woman from SEIU. Given that sate and that union, both of those supers can be marked down for Obama. Further, one of the congressional seats to be filled before the convention will go to Donna Edwards, who has also endorsed Obama. Taken together, this amounts to three more superdelegates for Obama, reducing Clinton's advantage from 10-12 down to 7-9.

  • Private Obama Endorsers: In my limited discussions with uncommitted superdelegates, I have found two Obama supporters who are keeping their endorsements private for the time being, and two others who will be endorsing Obama before North Carolina. That is another four superdelegates for Obama, reducing Clinton's advantage from 7-9 down to only 3-5.

This analysis strongly suggests that Clinton's superdelegate advantage is actually down to the low single digits at this point, and quite possibly does not exist at all given that I only know about ten uncommitted superdelegates and there are probably a lot more private Obama endorses out there. Even if Clinton currently holds a lead of 5 among superdelegates, the current rate of superdelegate endorsements will result in her advantage disappearing entirely before the Pennsylvania primary on April 22nd. Even after Ohio and Texas, Obama is picking up about four superdelegates every week, while Clinton is only picking up about one and a half. That is enough to give Obama the lead among superdelegates in three more weeks.

The reason this is important is because, without Clinton's superdelegate advantage, Obama leads by 53 delegates even with Florida included, even with Michigan included, and even with Obama receiving zero delegates from Michigan. Clinton's advantage among superdelegates is vaguely keeping her campaign afloat at this point since it makes the delegate count appear close, and since the campaign has long argued it can flip enough superdelegates in order to secure the nomination. However, remove the superdelegate advantage, and then Obama take the nomination no matter what delegate count is used, and no matter what scenario campaigns dream up. When Obama takes the lead among superdelegates, Clinton's options shrink to zero. And, unless the analysis I present here is flawed, it appears that Obama is imminently poised to take the superdelegate lead even before Pennsylvania. As long as Obama can win Indiana, the end of the nomination campaign is nigh.  

Chris Bowers :: Clinton's Superdelegates Lead Nearly Erased

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Great analysis. (4.00 / 1)
I don't know if Rep. Altmire in Pennsylvania is on your list of probable Obama declarers, but it seems clear he's leaning that direction:

http://www.wjactv.com/news/157...

Altmire described a recent phone call from Bill Clinton. He said the former president was "giddy" and excited by Senator Clinton's performance in Texas and Ohio. But Altmire said he objected when Bill Clinton began making negative comments about Obama and Obama's campaign.

Altmire said, "Senator Obama has been in constant contact with us. He took a much more longterm view of this from the beginning, whereas the Clintons never thought Pennsylvania was gonna be important. They kind of ignored us for awhile and now they're a little bit late to the game."

He seems to be wavering on whether to endorse before or after the PA primary, though.


I wish (0.00 / 0)
Altmire would just get off the fence and endorse Obama already. He's said nothing but but good things about him everywhere, so it's not like it's a secret or anything.

Two possibilities: 1.  He's in a fairly red district, and is himself a bush-dog, so doesn't want to alienate his indy/red constituents; or, 2. He's waiting for the right date, hopefully before April 22, to do the deed, hopefully with Obama in attendance.


[ Parent ]
Let's hope the end comes quickly. (4.00 / 1)
Great article, and consistent with the analysis on the demconwatch blog.  What began as a trickle is now becoming a steady stream.  Let's just hope that the Obama Superdelegate tide overtakes Hillary soon, so that we can all unite behind Barack and begin our efforts to retake the White House in the fall.

Can you explain why Obama MUST win Indiana (0.00 / 0)
to end the nomination campaign?  Is it just a matter of Clinton getting a moral victory? She sure isn't going to get many delegates there, even with a win, since it is going to be determined by <10%. Especially since on the same day Obama is going to clobber her in North Carolina.


Must win IN to end the campaign right there and then (0.00 / 0)
That's how I interpreted Chris's phrase and the version that I agree with. If Obama wins NC but HRC wins IN, there will be no new reason or added pressure for her to drop out. While not guaranteed, a double-win for Obama on May 6th makes it likely that HRC will drop out and not drag this thing on any longer.

[ Parent ]
great analysis, but... (0.00 / 0)

Of the DNC slots, one is from Illinois, and another is an at-large spot that I have learned is currently slated to go to an African-American woman from SEIU. Given that sate and that union, both of those supers can be marked down for Obama.

Are you assuming they'll both endorse Obama just because they're from Illinois and black, or is there more supporting information you just didn't share with us? Because, if not, one could say the African-American woman might support Clinton because she's female, for example.


Illinois and SEIU (0.00 / 0)
I'm assuming that yes, the Illinois will endorse because of the home state (Clinton has no supers from Illinois) and that the SEIU woman will endorse to stay with her union. Union leadership has a very, very strong tendency to show solidarity with the union.  

[ Parent ]
Jimmy Carter (4.00 / 2)
You can probably sorta almost add Jimmy Carter to the list as well.  Looky here: http://ap.google.com/article/A...

Are you (0.00 / 0)
you're just trying to make me happy?  If so, it worked!

What about the rumored 7 in NC? (0.00 / 0)
I know it was denied by Obama, but I doubt the WSJ pulled that story out of nowhere.  Is there any news on those endorsements?

John McCain won't insure children

I can confirm two (4.00 / 2)
I can confirm that two NC House members will endorse, and that one is truly uncommitted and waiting to see what happens. About the four others, I have no idea.  

[ Parent ]
Indiana more like Ohio than Illinois (0.00 / 0)
I think it's possible that Obama can win Indiana, but I also think there's been too much optimism throughout the blogosphere about the Hoosier state, no doubt because of that preposterous poll that showed him up 40-25% earlier.  Indiana is a tough state for Obama, more like Ohio than Illinois.  So I agree with Chris that an IN + NC sweep on 5/6 could end it, but I remain cautious about the odds.

I am looking for a win (0.00 / 0)
in PA.  The latest poll by Public Policy Polling has Obama ahead by two points.  The results need to viewed with some caution, but the trending does suggest a tight race and points to an upset.

That poll... (0.00 / 0)
... is an outlier. I am going by SUSA, myself. If Obama can pull off a 3-5% win in PA, I think there would be a much stronger tide of supers going for Obama. He did it in TX. He could do it in PA too.

[ Parent ]
great post!!! thanks for the insights (0.00 / 0)
Indiana however looks tough...

Flood of superdelegates (4.00 / 1)
I'm from PA and by the looks of it Clinton's lead is down to an average of 5pts and she is even behind in 1 poll. This all with still 2 1/2 weeks till the primary. If Obama keeps this state close, or even pulls it out, I think you will see a large amount of superdelegates flow his way.

Fantastic read! One point... (0.00 / 0)
I agree with this post wholeheartedly.

Here's a point to consider -- why can't he knock her out? As in, why can't he take one of 'her' states, as opposed to closing the gap but still losing the popular vote.

It seems to me that with this much good mojo, he should be able to peel back that extra 3 or 4 percent he might otherwise be missing in a place like PA or IN.

And I say this as an Obama supporter. I'm holding out hope that he'll pull off PA in the end, which would effectively, immediately end this wretched yet fantastic mess. I'm certainly not predicting it though...

Okay, I lied. One more point -- has all of this worry and fretting about super delegates been much ado about nothing? Many of us have made, at some point another, the point that common sense dictates the super delegates were never going to, as a group, vote against the pledged delegate winner, that it was only a matter of time until he caught up in super delegates. A lot of ink has been spilled here and elsewhere about the dangerous, complex mess we are in, when all the time it was actually fairly simple and safe.


[ Parent ]
Sorry, meant to respond (0.00 / 0)
to Chris, not onemanrules.

[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search