More Free Advice

by: Chris Bowers

Wed Aug 20, 2008 at 17:00


Josh Marshall has some free advice for Obama that he describes as "worth every penny." I actually think it is rather good:

Don't ever demand someone stop attacking you. Doesn't work. Don't do it. Sounds weak. Sounds pathetic. And a lot else.

Makes sense. Growing up a nerd, I never found that complaining about being picked on made me more popular. Doubt that it works among adults, either.

Let me offer Obama some more free advice of my own, also worth every penny:

  • Don't defund the 527's. I know that this is an old one, and that Obama has quietly changed his tune on 527s lately, but it seems pretty obvious. No one is going to vote for you because you stopped the evil 527 money from entering politics. However, people might very well vote for you because the 527s unleashed a $125 million spending barrage against your opponent.

  • Target white Democrats: Pretty much every demographic analysis of this election has shown that Obama is over-performing other recent Democratic nominees among many subgroups. However, the only subgroup where he is consistently under-performing is white Democrats (white Democrats of all types, too, including liberals and younger ones). Bring them into the fold by attacking McCain as a Republican, maybe even with a 30-second spot that just keeps repeating "John McCain is a Republican," over and over and over. Lob something partisan their way to rally around the flag with. This might also keep the percentage of Democrats in the electorate quite high.

  • Attack McCain's age. This might seem more dangerous, and I have cautioned against it before. However, it would seem foolish to avoid it at this point, because all of the clever attacks are being directed at Obama. We need to turn the tables, and this would help out quite a bit. For starters, voters want "change" in this election, and old age is an antithesis of change. Second, there is already a well-established national narrative about McCain's age, so it would reinforce existing anti-McCain narratives. Third, if the attack was done correctly, there would still be deniability that McCain's age was even being attacked. It could turn McCain into an angry, whiny, too sensitive candidate, which in turn makes him look old and weak. The narrative can thus reinforce itself even if McCain fights back.

Anyway, that's my free advice. Lots of it floating around these days. What do you have?  

Chris Bowers :: More Free Advice

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
More Free Advice | 45 comments
Age (0.00 / 0)
Something like this would be interesting.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...


Attacking McCain's age is easy .. (0.00 / 0)
say he's been in the Senate longer than Ted Stevens or Ted Kennedy(I know it is not true .. but it doesn't have to be .. it just points out McCain's age in subtle ways) .. there are plenty of ways to attack McCain's age in subtle manners .. it's all a matter of Obama's willingness to go there

[ Parent ]
Yep (4.00 / 2)
Another idea is to do what the Obama campaign did today.  You can go after McCain on his oldest flaw: that he's emotionally unstable.  They attacked him today in a conference call as a "hothead" and "reckless".  Richard Clarke was calling him "Quickdraw McCain".

If (big "if"!) the Obama campaign keeps pressing this button, then I think they're on to something very promising.


[ Parent ]
find surrogates who are willing to attack John McCain's lack of military experience (4.00 / 3)
McCain is relying on that like a wooden leg. Knock that out, and he's done. But he's not just relying upon it. He's resting on it as he builds up other legs on energy, taxes, values...

Obama never should have dissed Clark. He raised the point really well: being a good soldier doesn't make you a good president. McCain's stance is force, force, and more force. That's why he'd be a bad president.


Clark (0.00 / 0)
I'm hoping (and will probably be proved wrong within hours) that Obama dissed Clark to take him off the radar screen until he announces that he's picked him as his running mate.

It's all in the execution (4.00 / 2)
This is what I mean.

1.  "Don't demand someone stop attacking you." I agree, but I think McCain needs to be taken to task for belittling Obama's patriotism.  Thus, rather than Obama say "don't attack my patriotism," he should stand up and proclaim, "I'm not going to let anyone attack my patriotism," which is exactly what he did yesterday.

2.  You say "attack McCain's age." I'm sure you don't mean that Obama should crassly call McCain old and over the hill.  But I think he should, as often as possible, note how LONG McCain has been in Washington without solving problems, as well as use some coded language like "confused," "befuddled" etc.  And of course, a surrogate should do most of this.

3.  I agree about the 527s, but I thought Obama already backtracked on this.

4.  I agree he should target white Democrats by emphasizing core Democratic issues.


Marshall is right (4.00 / 6)
Josh Marshall (and Chris) are exactly right about Obama needing to stop begging McCain not to attack him.  Marshall's proposed lines (too bad McCain felt he had to adopt the Rove playbook, when you consider what they did to him; McCain used to be honorable, now he'll say anything to bet elected) are good.

Obama needs to continue the line on the economy that McCain will lower his own taxes but I (Obama) will lower yours.  Obama--the President of and for the People.

He needs to repeat the line he used with Rick Warren, and with equal passion, that it is just IRRESPONSIBLE  for someone from the older generation to support wars without a way to pay for them.  IRRESPONSIBLE to saddle the younger generation with so much debt.  F'Christ's sake, the national debt has almost doubled under Bush.  (Gone from $5.727 trillion on 1/20/2001 to $9.614 trillion today, with 5 months to go.  He was against Bush's tax cuts when we had a surplus, but now that we have a mountain of debt he's for making them permanent.  He'll say anything to be President.

John McCain--He's not who you think he is.


[ Parent ]
pith (4.00 / 2)
McCain will lower his own taxes but I (Obama) will lower yours.

That's really good. Kind of a so-obvious-I-never-thought-of-it-that-way kind of a thing. But everyone would get it. It's bumper stickerlicious.


[ Parent ]
I don't think Obama's phrasing helps (4.00 / 1)
Saying "I'm not going to let anyone attack my patriotism" looks weak if you then do very little. If he wants to rebuff those attacks, he needs to stop parrying and start riposting. When McCain attacks his patriotism, he should suggest that McCain is an unamerican lying weasel.

Forgotten Countries - a foreign policy-focused blog

[ Parent ]
"Experience" (4.00 / 3)
If I were managing the Obama communications team, I would absolutely run with this idea of "experience" and McCain.

I would equate with the idea of "experience" with everything wrong with DC, inside the beltway mentality, pound his 26 years of being a part of the problem, his voting in lock-step with Bush the last two years, his shifting with the wind like everyone else in DC when it's expedient..."experience" should become synonymous with "washingtonian".

And if you want to get Rovesque, then at worst, "experience" would also have subtle references to his age as well.

The election needs to be about Bush and Republicans...not about Obama...and "experience" is a powerful leverage that can also take the legs out from under him.  


McCain's line about questioning Obama's patriotism (4.00 / 1)
Absolutely!
Don't ever demand someone stop attacking you. Doesn't work. Don't do it. Sounds weak. Sounds pathetic. And a lot else.

Just look at McCain's answer to Obama's "demand" -

Yesterday, Senator Obama got a little testy on this issue. He said that I am questioning his patriotism. Let me be clear: I am not questioning his patriotism; I am questioning his judgment.

I winced when I read that - It's a good line and an effective attack.  Obama set it up - in baseball terms, he hung a curveball & McCain hit it hard.

I'm starting to worry that I'm seeing Dukakis II.

War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery; Ignorance is Strength; McCain/Palin 2008


I wouldn't go at his age directly (4.00 / 6)
What I would do (as I say in virtually every thread) is go at his mental fitness. There's a long, well documented of McCain sometimes-violent temper tantrums. By exposing his psychological problems you raise questions about his age without talking about his age.

You use in instability and mental problems as the frame for every issue,

On foreign policy: his a reckless, trigger happy war-lover who, according to his fellow POW, should be nowhere near the red button.

On the economy, he's absolutely deluded and out of it. He thinks people worth 4 million dollars are middle-class? What country is he's living in? Is he insane? He think the our economic problems are in our heads? It's he who has the mental problem.

This way, everytime he makes a gaffe--and he'll make a ton--the question of his mental fitness will be raised.

By November, we should have every in American wondering what sordid stuff is going on inside that old head.



Yes. (4.00 / 1)


sTiVo's rule: Just because YOU "wouldn't put it past 'em" doesn't prove that THEY did it.

[ Parent ]
Less Ageism, more Hothead attacks (4.00 / 2)


sTiVo's rule: Just because YOU "wouldn't put it past 'em" doesn't prove that THEY did it.

[ Parent ]
I'm really not sure (0.00 / 0)
That "hothead" , which is the specific version of this meme the Obama camp is starting to run with, communicates the message you want to communicate.

[ Parent ]
Well, it has to be done right. (0.00 / 0)
I'm not sure that Obama would do it right.  But it might work.  In conjunction with other stuff.

What's your preferred theme?

sTiVo's rule: Just because YOU "wouldn't put it past 'em" doesn't prove that THEY did it.


[ Parent ]
And here's the ad series I'd like to see: (4.00 / 6)
A little bit of humor, similar to some of Russ Feingold's & Paul Wellstone's earliest TV spots.

A narrator shows off John & Cindy's houses, with a tone straight from HGTV - "My, isn't this one nice!  Gotta have, what, 7000 square feet!  Absolutely lovely!"

"And here we have John and Cindy's Sedona getaway.  The servant's quarters in the back look a little cramped, but look at what they've done with the pool!"

A little sojourn into a store to peek at John's $500 shoes (with a chat with a salesperson), add a clip of John's "$5 million is middle class".  

You could probably run 5-10 ads around this theme.

War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery; Ignorance is Strength; McCain/Palin 2008


Brilliant, blows the celebrity ad out of the water (4.00 / 2)
gets at the fundamental point  that John McSame cannot relate to the average American

[ Parent ]
He wont do it, but I think (4.00 / 2)
Obama should just call McCain an idiot.

It's easily proven too.

Michael Bloomberg, prince of corporate welfare


Attack McCain's Credibility (4.00 / 3)
The man is running a campaign of demonstrable lies from the Straight Talk Express. If Obama's media/messaging people can't turn that against McCain they should just resign now...

Health care reform = Employer payroll savings = More hiring and more jobs!

And Obama should refer to it .. (4.00 / 1)
as the Double Talk Express

[ Parent ]
And I forgot to mention .. (4.00 / 1)
if McCain starts bitching about Obama getting dirty .. Obama should reply, "Sometimes you have to get in the gutter to clean out the rats" ... or something similar .. Obama needs to develop some effective one liners to counter McCain

[ Parent ]
Humor... (4.00 / 1)
...derisive mocking, sarcasm, contempt, dismissive scorn. They should turn the "Straight Talk" label into a laughing stock. Turn it so that the label is actually a negative for McCain.

It can be done -- and the impact would be profound.

Health care reform = Employer payroll savings = More hiring and more jobs!


[ Parent ]
Can be done with visuals, too (0.00 / 0)
Get a look-alike bus and show it swerving around corners, or driving off the the road in a reckless way.  Maybe doctor it up so that it has a two front-ends (like a push-me-pull you from Dr. Doolittle) and as the voice-over and text highlight McCain's contradictory statements, show the bus (labeled: "Double-Talk Express") lurching back-and-forth.  Put the bus on the side of the road - out of gas - broken down - just like the US infrastructure and McCain's ideas. Take long-shots of the bus driving very fast (preferably on a dusty road to emphasize the speed) and away from the camera as the narrator (or Obama) ask for clarification of McCain's policies. Or, go more high tech and take the viewer inside the Double Talk Express, where it look a bit like something out of a James Bond film.  Get a tough question?  Push the "smoke-screen" button.  Get stung by an Obama attack? Push the "mud-slinging" button. Get asked to justify your qualifications to be CiC? Push the "Noun, Verb, POW" button.


"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
Better yet - invite Hillary Clinton along (0.00 / 0)
It's time to go for the big pass down field, and get the star power going again in this campaign...

I think it's time (4.00 / 1)
for another Mike Lux diary.

If I were advicing Obama..... (0.00 / 0)
I'd have him say something like:

"John McSame, yes you heard me correctly, John McSame, just as we saw in 2004 when Republicans and George Bush, by omisssion - because Goerge Bush certainly didn't say knock it off - questioned John Kerry's patriotism, John McSame adopted that despicable tactic  yesterday  and questioned my patriotism......What is this all about really? Does John McSame, and he deserves that designation when he adopts and parrots behavior and policies put forth by George Bush and Republicans  both for governing and campaigning, .....Does John McSame really think that whomever the Democrats nominate that their patriotism is fair game? Does John McSame realize that there are registered Democrats serving in the armed forces at this time? Are they patriots? What do I have to do to satisfy John McSame's and the Republican operatives running his campaign, to convince them I am patriotic? How bout voting for expanding the GI Bill for the veterans you seem so willing to keep in unending wars? Is that patriotic enough for you John McSame? Where were you on that John McSame , hmmm?How about having people in the world respect America again by standing up for this country really is all about - the principles outlined in the Constitution of the US? Patriotic enough for you John McSame?

When you can answer those questions John McSame maybe we can get back to discussing the daily life of Americans in 2008 and the problems they face - and they do face problems John McSame - despite what your senior economic advisor Phil Gramm said that Americans are "whiners" about the current conditions they are experiencing and that it's 'all in their mind' yea, when you can have that discussion with me the American people will benefit."

That's how I'd have Obama respond - it shows strength( not whining) and gives him a way to stop it and maybe resume it if necessary


Good advice from (0.00 / 0)
you and Josh Marshall.  Much of it is so damn obvious that one wonders what the Obama campaign has been thinking.

This also is good:

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsme...

Wake Up, Obama Camp
By Theda Skocpol - August 20, 2008, 4:13PM

The last month has been excruciating for Obama supporters, watching him and his campaign squander so many hopes and resources on an utterly wimpy campaign. For me, the last straw was yesterday -- in the VFW speech when supposedly Obama was gettting tough against McCain's character assassination strategy -- to watch him speak like a soporific college professor, repeating McCain's charges at length, flattering McCain as honorable and patriotic, and then, finally, sort of begging McCain to take it back! Josh Marshall is totally right to call Obama out on this.

It goes on from there.


Call him "old" fashioned or refer to the "old" way of doing things in Washington (4.00 / 1)
That way you can highlight "old" but when McCain starts ranting about it, just say he's irritable and out of touch for confusing common English terms - after all, he confuses Sunni and Shia all the time.

Also oldfangled, oldstyle, olden or olden days

Also, instead of saying McCain is getting upset over something, say he's having a "seizure" over something, or having a "stroke" about something. Use modern terms (in the spirit of 'wigging out,' 'throwing a fit,' and 'spazzing') and if he complains, just accuse him of speaking old English and being so out of touch with modern lingo.

Help support "CRASHING THE STATES"--a Netroots Film!


Advice (0.00 / 0)
Josh Marhsall's advice is on target.  And so is yours, Chris.

I have two additional points.  first, don't ever use phrases such as "let me say ... ", "I'd like to point out ...",  etc.  Asking for permission is not a character of a leader.  

Second, pick a sitting Democratic governor (or in this election a retired general officer) as a running mate.  Absolutely no senators, please!!  We need someone with executive experience in government.  

Keep in mind that only two sitting senators have been elected President in the entire history of the United States:  John F. Kennedy and Warren Harding.  Senators just don't do that well.  This year, both major parties are on the verge of officially nominating a sitting senator.  This is unprecedented.  Usually at least one of the candidates comes from the executive branch of government (a governor, vice president, or a general).  We are going after the top two leadership positions in the United States, not to get an A+ in an academic seminar or a blue ribbon prize in a debating society.  

This is a "change" election.  That means an outsider has the advantage.  As Senator Obama said about being in the Senate for two years:  

"I know I haven't spent a lot of time learning the ways of Washington. But I've been there long enough to know that the ways of Washington must change."

He needs to reinforce that view by choosing an outsider.  To me, that means a governor.  A well-respected flag-rank military officer will do too in this environment, especially one critical of the 20th Century military-industrial complex.  

(a) Gov. Schweitzer (MT, 3 electoral votes) - an outstanding pick, maybe even a spillover effect into both Dakotas?

(b) Gov. Sebelius (KS, 6 electoral votes) - another good choice; an outstanding choice if ... and that's a big if ... she can deliver Kansas and have a spillover effect into nearby states such as Missouri, Colorado, Kansas, Iowa, and maybe NE-02 (Omaha).  However, carrying Kansas in a Presidential race is difficult given the very high number of GOPigs in that state.  

(c) Gov. Napolitano (AZ, 10 electoral votes) - a real "in your face" choice if ... and that's another mighty big if ... she can put Arizona in play and put the GOPigs on the defensive.  

(d) Gov. Strickland (OH, 20 electoral votes) - Locks up Ohio for us but age works against him.  He just turned 67.  And we need a good Democrat in Ohio to help clean up that place.

(e) Gov. Culver (IA, 7 electoral votes) - one of two Democratic Gen X governors (Gov O'Malley of Maryland is the other).  Admittedly a defensive choice since we will probably get Iowa anyway but youth is in his favor (remember, Senator Obama is a Gen Xer, too).  Gov. Culver may shore up support in Missouri, Wisconsin, NE-02, and Minnesota if McCain chooses Governor Pawlenty.  

(f) Gov. Rendell (PA, 21 electoral votes) - Again, a defensive pick as we will probably get Pennsylvania anyway, put Governor Rendell puts it in the Democratic column hands down.  

(g) Gov. Richardson (NM, 5 electoral votes) - Another defensive pick as New Mexico looks good, but Governor Richardson would guarantee it for us and maybe help out in the southwest.  

(h) General Clark - Another good choice, but I'm not sure what electoral votes he can deliver.  

(i) General Zinni - Maybe a touch old at age 65, but this retired Marine would make a good counterpoint to Senator McCain, especially General Zinni were to agree to only one term.  Again, what electoral votes can General Zinni deliver?

None of these people are perfect and there may be some things I don't know about a few that would make me change my mind.  

And with the modest talk about Senator Biden, please remember that he has been in Washington since he was 30 years old.  That's just over 35 years ... longer than McCain's been there!  Second, Senator Biden is aligned with the credit card industry.


Don't call him old (4.00 / 2)
Call him 72 years old.  

You don't have to attack his age.  All you have to do is mention the specific age.  Praise him for being remarkably spry at 72 years and hope his health holds up through the next 4 years considering all he has been through.

Attacking on age would be counter productive.  Mentioning it would be productive.


The liberal wiki
Send an email to terra@liberalwiki.com


free advice (4.00 / 1)
If you want to be the candidate for change- the voters have to know at least a couple of concrete things that you would change. If there aren't even a couple things you are willing to stick your neck out on to say that you would do differently then voters are going to start tuning you out. Ask an undecided voter what Obama would change and they simply can't tell you- thats a big problem. In the primary Obama had specifics out there but in the general he has tried to stick to generalities.

Attack McCain for being a republican, not for being the same as Bush. For 20 years McCain has built the image of being a maverick and he has had many memorable differences with Bush. But McCain is still running as a republican and the republican brand is poisonous enough that you can get enough traction out of that. If you attack McCain as being the same as Bush, voters know that you would have said it about anyone they ran and it has no weight. But McCain is out of the closet about being a republican- easier to attack him on that.

I wouldn't attack on age because in the end its going to be old people that decide this election. I think that McCain wants to be attacked on his age actually. Use the issue in the background of other ads- just pictures of him looking old or emphasizing situations where he would be out of touch but I wouldn't attack him on that directly.


Stop Praising McCain (4.00 / 5)
This one is really easy... Just stop praising McCain.  This is something Obama has been doing to preface every one of his attacks.  It's not necessary.

If someone asks him about McCain's service, he can just say "Yes, we appreciate John McCain's service to this country, but he knows nothing about bringing the change that we so desperately need right now."


Less appreciation (4.00 / 1)
If it has to be appreciated at all (and it can generally be ignored) it should be in something like this format:

"John McCain served his country well four decades ago, but..."

Emphasise the age and by extension the lack of relevance that experience had for executive office.

Forgotten Countries - a foreign policy-focused blog


[ Parent ]
some better attacks (4.00 / 1)
Josh also says: "McCain's weakness is that he's abandoned everything he always said he believed in, just to be president."

That's bad advice.  Everyone expects McCain will say or do anything to become president.  And no one cares except democrats that are already voting for Obama.  Forget that line of attack.

Also stop the economic panders.  No one like giveways.  Focus instead on taking away the giveways to the rich, but don't talk about adding giveways for everyone else.

Here are some good attacks:

McCain is hot head and unstable.  He never saw a war he didn't like.  He lacks judgment.  Is that the finger you want on the button?  Do you want your $$$ spent on fighting countless wars over the next 8 years, simple because McCain can't control himself?

McCain is old and out of touch.  He surrounds himself with the same people who have been running the country for the last 8 years, and that is who will be running the country in a McCain administration.  Do you really want 8 more years?

McCain will appoint radically conservative justices to the Supreme Court that will set this country back 100 years.


the fun stuff (0.00 / 0)
And show people your fun side, too.  Be genuine.  People need to like you before they will vote for you.

[ Parent ]
Big Ideas (0.00 / 0)
Universal healthcare.

Gore's proposal to replace the electrical grid, thus seriously tackling global warming.

Get troops out of Iraq (vs McCain's idea to reintroduce the draft).

None of these things will happen with McCain.

The way I see it, Obama is in a box of his own making.  He has identified the problem of American politics as divisiveness, and post-partisanship as the solution, some kind of mushy return to Eisenhower-ish consensus politics.  Attacking McCain trashes that story.

Admittedly his talk of post-partisanship is vapid nonsense, but it's the brand he was selling when he clinched the nomination.


Speaking of which (0.00 / 0)
How long has it been since the traditional media focused on any sort of policy differences between the two?

John McCain opposes the GI Bill.

[ Parent ]
ummm... (0.00 / 0)
maybe you have missed it but Obama hasn't particularly emphasized any sort of policy difference between the 2 for quite a while.

I keep saying it, no one buys that you are the candidate for change when you aren't willing to stick your neck out and say some concrete things that you will change. Seriously- ask the average voter what the major changes that Obama would enact and they won't know. In the primary he would talk specifics often, now he is just trying to speak in generalities


[ Parent ]
that was kinda my point n/t (0.00 / 0)


John McCain opposes the GI Bill.

[ Parent ]
Negative campaigns need to be MEMORABLE (4.00 / 1)
When Republicans go negative, they don't care how the media will perceive it, they don't care how their opponents will perceive it, they don't care if it's true or false, they just hit with it, as hard as they can.  They don't want to waste their money, they want their attacks to be remembered.

When Democrats go negative, such as Obama's apparent recent spate of ads in certain key states that hit on the economy, they're almost afraid to show them.  They hold them at arms length.  They can barely stand to think of themselves as responsible for them - in spite of the fact that the attacks are way closer to the truth than GOP attacks.  But Democrats seem like they don't even want their attacks to be noticed, let alone remembered.

Why so gingerly?  Let's take the economy, stupid.  If we want to attack McCain on the economy, let's not just have a dry recitation of numbers, or arguably insincere remarks about the feeling of pain.  (Sorry Barack, you don't really feel the pain, but that's okay).  Let's go after them.  Who's McCain's chief economic advisor.  Not "Senator Phil Gramm"  but "Enron Phil Gramm".  Make the attacks count.  McCain will deliver you to the same crooks who gave you Enron.  Show with pictures of all McCain's houses, and tie it to the Bush years.

If Dems are afraid to say stuff like that, then they're going to lose.  Why not try to win for a change?  


sTiVo's rule: Just because YOU "wouldn't put it past 'em" doesn't prove that THEY did it.


So memorable that they become code word (0.00 / 0)
for negative attacks a'la "swift-boating" one's opponent.


"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
Keating 5 (4.00 / 1)
Why this hasn't been a major critique of McCain from Obama, particularly in response to McCain's ad claiming that he's been around long enough to know what needs to be fixed in DC, I just can't figure.

And yeah, stop praising that guy. Everyone in Congress knows that, said properly, "my distinguished colleague" can mean 'that blithering waste of space,' but the public isn't used to it, the press have had their irony surgically removed, and the Republicans only talk like that in Congress.  


Offense, not defense (4.00 / 1)
And don't quote McCain, ever! "Celebrity," pah! That's their word for Obama is popular all over the world and McCain isn't. So don't say, "McCain is calling me a celebrity." Ignore the word [defense] but be sure to say [offense], No one likes John McCain. John McCain can't get more than 500 people to come to his rallies. Why? No one likes McCain. No one likes a whiner. No one likes a complainer. No one likes a guy who leaves his crippled wife for the rich 20 year old he's having an affair with, and who paid for his political career. No one likes a loser.  

This worked for him in the primary (4.00 / 2)
Don't ever demand someone stop attacking you. Doesn't work. Don't do it. Sounds weak. Sounds pathetic. And a lot else.

He attacked Hillary Clinton by complaining the big, bad meanie was attacking him.....on experience and by implication race.  The media agreed and the open minded members of the Democratic electorate said "shame on you" and with the media wind at his back he won.

It doesn't work this time because, against a Republican whom they admire,  rather than a woman they disdain...the media is no longer cooperating with his game plan.

He;s gotta win on his own.  

"Incrementalism isn't a different path to the same place, it could be a different path to a different place"
Stoller


More Free Advice | 45 comments
Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search